Suspiria (2018): It’s risky business remaking a sacred text,
especially now as we are all acutely aware of the current deficiency of
original content. To repurpose Daria Argento’s Suspiria is even more
treacherous as it’s oft regarded the wicked mother of the great giallo
tradition (I’m more of a Deep Red guy personally) regardless of what one might
ultimately think of it. To interpret this vocation as an opportunity to deepen
(Red Army Faction and Theresienstadtand transit camp), extend (50 minutes), stultify
the color palette, and sooth the unsettling Goblin soundscape is bold to put it
kindly. These are the things that seemingly made Suspiria what it was; the
attributes that sparked Luca Guadagnino to chase his critical darling, Call Me
By Your Name with a retelling of his lifelong object of horror affection. The
divided reaction was foreseeable, and the squawking rarely wafted from cries of
apostacy which sparked many telling and reactionary “I think the original is a
mess” responses. Regardless, when a director decides to inherit the namesake,
they must carry its weight like a specter. Luca’s movie shares much of Argentos
threadbare plot though it spends much of its time with formerly ancillary
characters. Suzy (Susie here) Bannon once again joins the Tanz Dance Academy
(now Markos Dance Company) to dance amongst a coven of necromancers hoping to
conjure/nurture an elder witch via female sacrifice. The aforementioned holocaust
allusion is heaped on the back of Jozef Klemperer, a psychiatrist whose missing
student belonged to said dance company. Her ramblings are prescribed as
delusions which later sparks a cheap but opportune line of dialogue about
believing women. Klemperer, whom it should be noted is one of three roles played
by Tilda Swinton here looking like Grandpa Sawyer, spends most of his time
investigating things that we have been explicitly shown, making the suspense
kind of pointless. He is haunted by the loss of his wife which he is revealed
to be complicit. She was a Jew who sought to flee the Third Reich but was
convinced to stay by her husband until it was too late. Their tragic romance is
cheaply exploited for an affixed emotional relevance, a register that
Guadagnino juggles throughout. I don’t mean to sound sensitive, but this
shoehorned addendum pissed me off. It ranks among the worst of sanctimonious
virtue baiting I’ve seen in a filmscape full of moral opportunism. The real joy
here is in the suffering, which at the very least is effectively unremitting
when it wants to be. Suzy’s story involves a pilgrimage from a grim Mennonite existence
to Berlin, illustrated via a child’s scribbling of hair on a map; a nice little
bit of foretelling. We are privy to brief glimpses of her mother’s final
moments, her crow rattle a looped sound bite during some of the most cliched
nightmare imagery imaginable. Said matriarch brought to mind the zealots of
Robert Eggers’ The VVitch; another modern horror hype vestige celebrated in
some circles as a bold feminist text though accepting this would be accepting
death and suffering well beyond the realm of what most of us consider actual
merit. The plight from rural to urban is much like the journey from piety to
paganism though rooting this freedom in witchcraft, especially the witchcraft
rooted in hierarchy and allegiance punishable by death, is not much different
from the legalist shackles of what most of us consider the Mennonite or Puritan
faith. ----- I am aware that this is the point as one of the characters
represents a new order which will usher in more a more merciful reign, which
kinda takes the piss out of everything IMO ------ Susie moves up the ranks
rather quickly, especially in the eyes of Madame Blanc (the only good Swinton
performance here) who is one of the only witches who seems apprehensive about
the impending Markos reign. Just as Germany was divided in 1977, so the coven can’t
seem to agree on where they are going, though not a single witch is above murder
or torture, especially to those who defy their power or go snooping around. One
of the snoopers is Sara (Mia Goth), a character I wish the movie was built
around, though this would mean doing away with the film’s final twist which
would be just fine by me. Sara’s narrative takes over right before the final
act (yes this movie is one of those with title card chapters) and ends cruelly
and abruptly with nothing to show for it. The finale, which is inexplicably
dominated by CG blood and a shitty slow-motion effect, attempts to shoehorn a
little Argento in for good measure. It’s wackadoo to be sure, though after
Panos Cosmatos’ sustained pandemonium in Mandy it feels like a cred-baiting
afterthought. This felt especially true as Guadagnino couldn’t help himself but
to return to real life atrocity and Thom York’s signature voice as penance. I
guess the thing that has me perplexed is how the Argento movie had any impact
on this guy? I understand that remakes come with the freedom of personal expression,
but when these freedoms only wrought a new Radiohead record and some tethered
social atrocities, I don’t think it’s worthy of the name Suspiria. I guess I’m
just part of the old guard yelling “Markos!” awaiting my head to explode.
No comments:
Post a Comment